Revised February 14th, 2024
Note: This content has been archived and may no longer be accurate or relevent
Takeaways from the meeting:
- About 50 residents attended to hear the details of the “scoping”[1] information gathered to date. This was followed by Q&A from the audience, with questions based on pedestrian safety, project costs and a construction time frame. See the city’s webpage on this project here.
- City officials did a commendable job of keeping the group mostly focused and on point. Residents responded with thoughtful questions and remained civil throughout the meeting.
- The City included recent helpful traffic data, with a speed study, and explained the pros and cons of mill and overlay[2] vs. reclamation.[3]
- They unveiled the potential to realign the Regional Trail crossing at Smithtown/Eureka to two 90 degree crossings.
The meeting was productive and seemed somewhat reassuring to the residents.
Some key opportunities were missed by the City:
- First: To make known, at the beginning of the presentation, that there is $0 (no) special assessment for the project. Residents may have discussed design options differently if their primary concern was not out-of-pocket costs to finance the project.
- Next: Provide handouts explaining right-of-way (ROW):
- The City owns the ROW and can take corrective actions, as needed, to comply with its ordinance. Full stop. For some reason, the staff lips stayed motionless when it came to explaining and enforcing ROW. Ord. 901.01. A roadway project is the optimal opportunity for the city to regain “ownership” of its ROW. See The Cost of Reclaiming Right-of-Way.
- City ordinance 901.01 does not allow resident construction or landscaping in the ROW. Read the Ordinance here. Contrary to the existing ordinance, Staff mistakenly talked about protecting trees as close as five feet to the roadway surface–in the right-of-way.
- Maps that included the ROW marked on the properties. Find your right-of-way here.
- The City owns the ROW and can take corrective actions, as needed, to comply with its ordinance. Full stop. For some reason, the staff lips stayed motionless when it came to explaining and enforcing ROW. Ord. 901.01. A roadway project is the optimal opportunity for the city to regain “ownership” of its ROW. See The Cost of Reclaiming Right-of-Way.
- Finally, incorporate an introduction to “Safe Route to Schools” study.
SCA editors’ comment: The City has and employs a Communications/Marketing Director. They should be utilized in developing a thorough communication plan for any project.
History: Nov. 2023 Update
- Scoping is the process of developing the project scope.
- A street maintenance technique that requires the removal of the top layer (2″) of a street by the grinding action of a large milling machine. After the top layer is removed, a new layer of bituminous pavement is put in its place.↑
- This process pulverizes an existing pavement and base materials, mixing the resulting mass with water and cement, and then repaving it as a base that can be finished with a concrete or asphalt overlay. ↑
Was this post useful?
Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0
No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.
Comments are not available for archived posts
(Visited 129 times, 1 visits today)
You should talk to the residents of Eureka Road and Birch Bluff. Providing a rehash of the meeting doesn’t do justice to legitimate resident concerns regarding tree removal, safety, cost and other issues. At the meeting the consultant provided superficial responses, vague assurances and no concrete details while city council members cowered in the back. All neighborhoods have the right and responsibility to protect its tree canopy regardless of where the tree happens to grow. Most municipalities stringently protect boulevard trees – and for many good reasons. We welcome the chance to discuss with the editors of Shorewood Citizen Advocates our concerns with the proposed Eureka Road project and broader issues we have with Shorewood governance. We can be reached at the email below or at eurekardneighborhoodassoc@gmail.com
Thank you for your comment.
As a general policy, we are declining meetings with the various people and groups that have asked us.
We do invite you or your group to submit a factual, respectful article for publication on this site detailing your concerns. We strongly believe that hearing directly from residents and organizations in their own words is far more meaningful than having SCA interpret those concerns.
Our email address is: info@shorewoodcitizenadvocates.com