Consistency

…means adhering to the governing documents in each case and treating each non-compliant issue in the same manner

Lack of clarity in zoning violation enforcement process. Shorewood’s policy is to enforce code violations on a “complaint only” basis. This policy has been enacted without resident conversation
Resident confronts council (starts at 7:20) on special treatment regarding the Mayor’s dock violations
Inconsistency in variances granted: Smithtown fence (see p. 7) Smithtown Circle (see p. 9) accessory shed (required to move a building that did not comply) and a dock (allowed to keep a dock that did not comply.)
Investment groups are buying homes and renting them. According to Shorewood’s Housing Ordinance, City inspections are required to protect the health, safety and welfare of residents, and to maintain the housing quality in the City.
As a property owner, the City of Shorewood does not comply with its own codes including park land, right of way, fire lanes, and vacant city property
Road Inspector to is not maximizing his job description

Be consistent in granting variances. The optics of granting to one neighbor and not another based on who they are, or where they live, or a commissioner’s subjective opinion of what is “attractive,” or not, is not consistent governance
Make public a directory of rentals and their inspection “scores.” The score could be based on a checklist or “report card.” Educate residents about the status of a blighted property in their neighborhood
Create a model city for accessibility by exceeding the basic ADA standards in public spaces
Expect the City to comply with its own ordinances, and State rules. Often, when violations are reported, action is not taken. See ClickFix.com for various reports made about city-owned right-of-way trees and boulders, traffic visibility, and park issues
Form an ad hoc citizen’s committee to determine the effectiveness of a “complaint only policy” and to develop a fair, cohesive framework for the future