Shorewood Citizen Advocates

Building positive change through communication, education and advocacy

A Council Tied in Knots Over Hearing From Residents

Revised April 28, 2024

“Every resident should be welcome, feel welcome, approached kindly, listened to, actually considered, and given the same amount of time on the floor as millionaire developers.”  – Shorewood Resident (name withheld at their request).

At a 2023 council meeting the  Matters from the Floor (MFTF) format was vigorously debated. Watch the discussion starting at hr. 2:04:10. Additional reading at source: 4-10-23 City Council Work Session Minutes, p. 3-6

Meanwhile…even when MFTF segments may be painful (watch the 4.10.23 work session starting at hr. 2:04:14), a majority of the Council vigorously debated and mostly resisted allowing any changes to the the three minute, no Q&A, format now in place.  In fact, Maddy said if it were up to him there would be no public comment at any regular council meeting.  He didn’t stop there:

“Never have I learned anything from Matters From the Floor.  It’s just people complaining about stuff that is off topic…People in the audience paid money for code analysis for what they are proposing.  People who care about what’s on the agenda, not what other people are complaining about.”  — Council member Maddy, watch it here (start at 2:04:30)

Sanschagrin disagreed, saying residents had a right to be heard and it was the Council’s job to listen, no matter how unpleasant.

This conversation about residents being allowed to speak at Council meetings is not new.  Going back to the Sept. 13, 2021 regular meeting, where the hybrid meeting option was being discussed, council members felt if any matter was important enough, residents could show up at City Hall and speak in person. 

They elaborated on their “fear” of answering emails and returning phone calls, due to irate residents.  One incorrectly stated that talking with a resident about city business violated the Open Meeting Law.  Note: A majority of the Council (quorum) must be present to for this scenario to violate the open meeting law.

Some Council members support exercising strong controls about resident communication at Council meetings because, as they say, in the past, several residents were perceived as disrespectful to the Council at MFTF. 

Another work session was held in Fall 2023 to “pound out rules” for MFTH.  Read the list of criteria here.

Note: The open meeting law does not guarantee public input at meetings. It is at the council’s discretion.

Was this post useful?

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

(Visited 197 times, 1 visits today)

Subscribe and get new SCA content delivered to your inbox

Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Subscribe
Notify of

All comments will be reviewed before posting. Respectful debate and disagreement is welcome. Threats or profanity will not be approved.

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
  •  

  •  

  •  

  • Featured Articles

  •  

  • Most Read Articles

  • Enter your information to receive new SCA content in your email inbox

    You will receive a confirmation email after submission

    Register Here to Receive Email Notifications of New Content

    LogoM-white-center.png